Get Real testing campaign: why new laboratory tests will do little to improve real-world fuel economy
The report shows that the CO2 emissions gap between the independently performed WLTP and NEDC tests is small, and suggests the new WLTP test procedure is likely not sufficient to reduce or close the gap between official and real-world CO2 emissions. The report also stresses the lack of transparency about vehicle data, which complicates the analysis of independent tests and makes possible cheating harder to detect.
Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
In order to understand what effect the WLTP test will have on new cars’ real-world CO2 performance and fuel consumption, the Get Real project had three different WLTP-approved vehicles tested by Emisia, an independent laboratory, to test: a petrol Opel Adam I (with an indirect injection system), a petrol Ford Fiesta VII (with a direct injection system) and a diesel Honda Civic X.
Related Articles
View All
Charging infrastructure has far outpaced EV sales in all but one EU country – analysis
Only Malta falls short on the EU’s fleet-based target for public charging.
EU backs electrification to make Europe more secure
EU Commission identifies grids as a bottleneck for electrification, promising to standardise vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology
Are the EV tariffs working? Western carmakers shifted production to EU, but Chinese brands continue to grow – analysis
Imports of Chinese batteries, which face virtually no tariffs, increased seven fold