Europe’s largest airlines claim net zero future whilst lobbying to weaken EU’s climate laws
New analysis by Transport & Environment (T&E) finds that the four legacy carriers - Air France, Lufthansa, Iberia and Aer Lingus - are working to water down EU’s climate plans for aviation, letting up to 72% of EU aviation emissions off the hook .
Despite publicly committing to net zero emissions by 2050 , T&E’s analysis of corporate position papers finds that Europe’s biggest airlines have been lobbying decision makers to weaken the environmental ambition of the EU’s climate plans for aviation, such as its sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) proposal (ReFuelEU). These papers reveal major discrepancies between the airlines’ public commitments and their tenacious lobbying efforts.
The lobbying efforts are made directly by airlines or under the guise of front groups such as the International Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents the interests of legacy carriers such as Iberia and Aer Lingus (under the IAG group), Air France-KLM, and Lufthansa – all of which are the subject of T&E’s new analysis. The study finds clear signs that IATA and IAG’s positions have filtered through a number of amendments submitted by decision makers to the European Parliament. This analysis corroborates findings by InfluenceMap that found that negative climate lobbying efforts are led by the IATA and airlines, such as Air France-KLM and Lufthansa.
Jo Dardenne, aviation manager at T&E, says: “It’s no news that legacy carriers have enjoyed preferential treatment under EU climate measures. They make crowd-pleasing pledges of net-zero emissions, which is music to the ears of their investors and customers. But in the background, they send IAG and IATA to do their dirty work: lobby to weaken the EU’s climate package so they can continue to pollute for free.”
IAG and IATA are looking to weaken the EU’s sustainable aviation fuels proposal (ReFuelEU), by asking for the scope of the EU’s proposed fuel mandate to only apply to intra-EU flights. T&E calculations find that, if they were successful in their efforts, a mere 28% of emissions from flights departing from Europe would be covered by ReFuelEU – meaning that a large majority of flights would not be affected by the EU’s SAF mandate. The European Commission’s current proposal covers 92% of emissions of flights departing from Europe. If implemented, the Commission’s proposal would mark a step change in the EU’s effort to address aviation’s climate impact.
Impact of IATA and IAG proposals to amend ReFuelEU on emissions covered 
Despite pushing for ReFuelEU to only apply to intra-EU flights, they try to redeem themselves by pushing for a higher mandate for SAFs (10% in 2030, instead of the 5% proposed by the Commission). But T&E’s analysis shows that an increased SAF mandate would not counteract the disastrous effects of a SAF mandate only on intra-EU flights. By 2030, it would lead to reducing the actual emissions savings expected EU wide by 38%.
Impact of IAG’s amendments on EU27 departing emissions savings from the ReFuelEU proposal for 2030 
IAG has also lobbied to remove the sub-mandate for e-kerosene, the only fuel capable of being scaled up to meet the sector’s enormous fuel demands. Scrapping the mandate would leave the sector reliant on unsustainable animal fats and used cooking oil. It goes against the airlines’ public statements, expressing support for innovative technologies including e-kerosene.
IATA and IAG’s relentless support for the UN’s flawed carbon offsetting scheme CORSIA is a final proof of the group’s negative climate lobbying efforts on behalf of legacy carriers. IAG is asking for more time to give CORSIA the room to become an effective scheme, using the example of the EU ETS, which took 10 years to set up. However, we cannot wait for another 10 years to tackle aviation’s climate problem, and less so with an offsetting scheme that has already been proven ineffective.
“IATA, IAG and legacy airlines have one goal only: how can we continue to pollute but not pay? It is easy to find traces of their lobbying efforts in watered down climate texts. Long haul polluting flights have been left off the hook for long enough. If the EU is serious about tackling aviation’s climate problem and making the polluters pay, it must no longer bow to the demands of these industry lobby groups. Instead it must continue to make its climate laws as ambitious as possible”, concluded Jo Dardenne.
Note to editors:
 72% of emissions from flights departing from EU27, including outermost regions.
 Air France net zero pledge: https://corporate.airfrance.com/en/press-release/air-france-group-commits-setting-science-based-greenhouse-gas-emission-reduction
Iberia net zero pledge: https://www.iberiaplusmagazine.iberia.com/en/articles/2020/9/iberia-keeps-looking-to-the-future/
Aer Lingus net zero pledge: https://www.aerlingus.com/about-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability/
Lufthansa net zero pledge: https://www.lufthansagroup.com/en/themes/climate-protection-goals.html
 T&E’s in-house calculations using AIS data from PlaneFinder (2019) and Eurocontrol CO2 calculator. 2019 was used as the last year prior to the Covid crisis. Emission reductions are calculated assuming a GHG reduction factor of 85% for SAF compared to fossil kerosene.