Briefing

The revised FQD: weakened proposal must still be implemented

November 6, 2014

This briefing looks at the main features of the 2014 proposal too implement Article 7a of the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). Despite weakening – due to intense lobbying by the Canadian and US governments and oil companies – some of the elements of the 2014 proposal are worth implementing and strengthening, such as the new reporting of crude oil imports by market crude oil names (MCONs). In addition, the 2014 proposal gives fuel suppliers new ways to meet the FQD target, such as promoting low-carbon electricity used in transport.

This briefing looks at the main features of the 2014 proposal and the main changes compared to the previous proposal from 2011. Despite the weakening, some of the elements of the 2014 proposal are worth implementing and strengthening, such as the new reporting of crude oil imports by market crude oil names (MCONs). In addition, the 2014 proposal gives fuel suppliers new ways to meet the FQD target, such as promoting low-carbon electricity used in transport.

The table below compares the two different proposals released by the European Commission in 2011 and in 2014 to implement the Fuel Quality Directive. It looks at the differences between the two proposals: reporting requirements, estimated costs, environmental impacts, etc.

Related Articles

View All
Publication

Where's your HVO been?

Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) is marketed as green, but it’s currently a suspicious mix. Want to know what’s in it?

Opinion

Can Europe go electric and remain sovereign?

The Greenland crisis showed that if Europe shows spine, it can be strong. It must now apply that lesson to industrial policy, or suffer the consequenc...

Press Release

EU to phase out damaging soy biofuels

Soy biofuels will no longer count towards EU renewable targets, with new EU Commission research confirming they contribute significantly to deforestat...