Shining a light on decision-making
In recent years, there have been numerous examples of member states hiding behind Brussels’ procedures such as the opaque comitology procedure. Member states managed to significantly weaken implementing legislation, such as air pollution limits, or refusing to take a decision at all. It was up to the Commission to take a final, often unpopular decision - for which the Commission was then blamed - which led to the infamous Brussels Blame Game. As a response, Commission president Juncker proposed a targeted reform of the Comitology Regulation 182/2011.
Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
While T&E welcomes any attempt to make member states more accountable and procedures more transparent, we believe the reform is not going far enough.
Concretely we demand that:
- the transparency requirements must be significantly scaled up;
- the reform must apply to comitology in its entirety;
- trade-offs at ministerial level must be avoided;
- and the European Parliament be put on equal footing if new responsibilities are created for the Council.
Related Articles
View All
Are electric trucks cheaper to operate than diesel?
A new T&E analysis looking at major truck markets in the EU
New interactive dashboard
Electric trucks vs diesel trucks: which are cheaper to run?
This calculator compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) of battery-electric and combustion-engine trucks in Europe
Electric trucks cheaper to operate than diesel for almost half of trucks sold in EU - new analysis
As EU hauliers face another diesel price shock, electrification offers the only realistic option to protect them against future oil crises