Briefing

Shining a light on decision-making

June 1, 2017

In recent years, there have been numerous examples of member states hiding behind Brussels’ procedures such as the opaque comitology procedure. Member states managed to significantly weaken implementing legislation, such as air pollution limits, or refusing to take a decision at all. It was up to the Commission to take a final, often unpopular decision - for which the Commission was then blamed - which led to the infamous Brussels Blame Game. As a response, Commission president Juncker proposed a targeted reform of the Comitology Regulation 182/2011.

 

While T&E welcomes any attempt to make member states more accountable and procedures more transparent, we believe the reform is not going far enough.

Concretely we demand that:

  • the transparency requirements must be significantly scaled up;
  • the reform must apply to comitology in its entirety;
  • trade-offs at ministerial level must be avoided;
  • and the European Parliament be put on equal footing if new responsibilities are created for the Council.

Related Articles

View All
Chapter 3.png
Opinion

Trump’s attack on UN shipping deal is a harbinger of what’s to come. Here’s how countries can still get climate action done
Press Release

Truckmakers lobby European Commission to weaken their emissions targets and cut zero emission truck sales

Scania, MAN, Volvo Trucks, Daimler, IVECO and Ford sent a letter to EU Commissioners asking to delay Europe’s transition to zero emission trucks.

Press Release

Tax fossil fuel profits to reduce exposure to energy price spikes or end subsidies, says T&E

Fossil fuel companies made €180bn in taxable profits in the EU in the two years following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine