How serious is the EU about ending deforestation?
On 29 March, the EU institutions have a last chance to save over 600,000 hectares of forests and peatlands, by agreeing on a fast phase-out of soy and palm oil in the bloc’s biofuels
Since Autumn last year, the EU institutions are negotiating a revision of the bloc’s ‘Renewable Energy Directive’ (RED). The final negotiations have been set for March 29. On the table for this last round of talks between the Commission, Council and Parliaments is the Parliament’s proposal to include soy in the phase-out of biofuels with a high risk of deforestation, currently limited to palm oil only.
The use of both shall also end much earlier than the currently agreed 2030 timeline. But the Commission is blocking this proposal, out of concerns over being sued again at the World Trade Organisation and out of concerns over such a move jeopardising trade talks with the Mercosur countries in South America. The Council, currently led by Sweden, is sitting on the fence, with only some member states (Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Germany) having expressed their support for the Parliament’s proposal.
In this short briefing, we show how much forests and peatlands are at risk, if the Commission is successful and nothing changes. T&E urges the Commission and also the Council, to agree to the Parliament’s proposal, supporting a rapid phase out of both soy and palm oil from EU biofuels.
Related Articles
View All
Majority of Europeans back reducing fossil fuel imports to make Europe safer, polling shows
YouGov poll findings commissioned by E3G, T&E and the Electrification Alliance
150 new power plants: the cost of balancing the grid if the EU slashes EV targets
Scaling back the EU’s electric car targets makes the transition to renewables far more expensive to achieve.
Weakening CO₂ standards undermines the Vehicle-to-Grid potential of EVs
A new report by Fraunhofer ISI examines the diminished benefits of V2G for Europe's electricity system if the EU weakens its car CO2 targets.