Biofuels ‘Could Be Worse For Warming’
A new report by atmospheric scientists says growing and burning many of the biofuel crops currently being introduced to transport could be raising overall greenhouse gas emissions, not lowering them.
[mailchimp_signup][/mailchimp_signup]
The study from Edinburgh university, on which the Nobel prize-winning chemist Paul Crutzen worked, says some biomass crops release around twice the amount of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N20, also known as laughing gas), which not only wipes out any savings of greenhouse gases but in fact increases global warming emissions. Among the fuels that score badly are rapeseed biodiesel and corn bioethanol, while only cane sugar bioethanol of the fuels studied looks like a better alternative to conventional fuels. A co-author of the study told Chemistry World magazine: ‘What we are saying is that [growing many biofuels] is probably of no benefit and is making the climate issue worse.’
This news story is taken from the October 2007 edition of T&E Bulletin.
Related Articles
View All
The need for maintaining Renewable Energy Directive stability in the post-2030 energy framework
NGOs, civil society and industry call on the European Commission to refrain from reopening the RED legislative framework during the negotiation of the...
Now including Q3 2026
Plugged in: T&E's EV market watch
What is happening in the European electric car market and how does it differ across countries? Explore the data, trends and milestones.
From barrel to battery: what will Europe’s clean car debate decide
The new energy reality: 1 kWh of battery is cheaper than a barrel of oil