Gap between official and real-world CO2 up to 45%, says EEA
The European Environment Agency (EEA) has attempted to explain why the EU’s current emissions testing system for new cars is giving readings that are very different from emissions in real-life driving.
Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
The EEA has published a report, Explaining road transport emissions: a non-technical guide, which gives a simplified explanation of the information on road emissions and the technology available to reduce them. It confirms that the EU’s testing procedure produces misleading emissions data and says there are three main reasons: a current testing system that is outdated, permitted flexibilities in the current testing regime that allow car makers to achieve artificially low emissions readings; and factors which cannot be taken into account in a laboratory test such as driver behaviour or certain weather.
It is the first time the EEA has acknowledged the gap by publishing both the official and ‘real-world’ CO2 figures. ‘The discrepancy between type approval and real-world CO2 emissions is about 40–45 %,’ it says.
The current EU testing procedure is due to be replaced in 2017 or 2018 by a more accurate testing system.
Related Articles
View All
Drive forward or turn back? Four reasons to vote for a strong automotive package
The coming weeks will be crucial for the future of the EU's car and van CO₂ standards and Clean Corporate Vehicles Regulation — a choice that will sha...
The zombie engine: How Brussels bureaucrats are breathing false life into combustion
If you poured rapeseed oil into a combustion engine and declared it a "zero-emission vehicle," you would be laughed at. But in the EU Parliament, this...
What Europe can learn from China if it wants to save its industry
Something I learned from my trip to China: you can be fast followers if you're willing to learn from the best.