New research debunks carmakers' claims that Euro 7 standards won't significantly improve the quality of the air we breathe.
One of the main claims made by carmakers opposing the introduction of Euro 7 standards, is that they won’t significantly improve the quality of the air we breathe. New research commissioned by Transport & Environment and carried out by Air Quality Consultants debunks this.
The results show that aligning car and truck NOx pollution limits with robust Euro 7 limits (i.e. 30mg/km for cars, 350 mg/kWh cold limit and 90 mg/kWh hot limit for trucks-which were found to be the optimal policy option by the Euro 7 Impact Assessment) will reduce NO2 pollution from road transport in Brussels, Madrid, Milan, Paris and Warsaw by around 50% by 2035. This will result in up to 24% lower concentrations of toxic NO2 in pollution hotspots in those cities in 2035.
The study also shows that without Euro 7 or other actions to reduce pollution such as more stringent low- and zero-emission zones, Brussels, Madrid, Paris and Warsaw are unable to comply with the NO2 limits proposed by the revision of the Ambient Air Quality Directive until after 2035.
In addition, greater ambition on brake pollution limits could also rapidly accelerate reductions in particle pollution from brakes. A brake particle limit of 3mg/km in 2025 instead of 7 mg/km in 2025 and 3 mg/km in 2035 would almost double the reduction in brake particle pollution from 19% to 34% already in 2030.
Overall, the results show that a robust Euro 7 delivers substantial improvements in air quality on top of the car and truck CO2 standards.
After crying wolf on the 2025 EU target despite EV sales growing in Germany, the industry now wants to roll back the 2035 standard.
T&E's William Todts assesses the EU Commission chief's three biggest promises
Cutting regulation is a gift to China’s car makers
Europe’s carmakers have a unique competitive advantage over their Chinese counterparts - yet the Omnibus proposals risk throwing it away