Tar sands, heavy crudes, and the EU Fuel Quality Directive
The European Union’s fuel-quality directive currently proposes to assign a default emissions value to natural bitumen (oilsands) that is higher than the value for conventional crude oil, inrecognition of the increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the production and upgrading of oilsands.
The report conducted by Canandian environmental organisation, The Pembina Institute, shows that there is a very clear distinction between the GHG intensities of natural bitumen and conventional crudes in the vast majority of production. The life cycle GHG emissions intensity (emissions per unit energy from “well to wheel”) of tar sands ranges from around 12 to 40 per cent higher than the average intensity of conventional fuels used by Europeans. On average, all conventional crudes (with the exception of a tiny fraction of them) have consistently lower emissions intensities than the average oilsands. Even when comparing the tar sands with a subset of the heaviest crudes entering Europe or sources with high levels of illegal or unregulated flaring, there is a clear difference between averages. Given this clear distinction, the treatment of ‘natural bitumen’ as a separate crude is well justified.
Related Articles
View All
What the Electrification Action Plan means for transport
T&E's in-depth review of the EU Commission's Electrification Action Plan
EU backs electrification to make Europe more secure
EU Commission identifies grids as a bottleneck for electrification, promising to standardise vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology
EU takes half-hearted step towards taxing international flights
Extension of ETS to some international flights, private jets and to smaller ships are steps forward, but overall weakening of the ETS undermines Europ...