The best available scientific evidence shows that the carbon costs of many bioenergy options are high.
Two principle gaps exist in the current accounting scheme for GHG emissions from bioenergy and biofuels, one temporal and one spatial in nature:
While both studies presented in this briefing concentrate on carbon, it must be noted that other environmental impacts, such as loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, are also significant and must be considered in policy decisions on bioenergy and biofuels.
The European Commission missed a big opportunity to create a cleantech bazooka.
As the aviation industry continue to gather at the Paris Air Show, where manufacturers are showcasing their latest fossil-fuel-powered aircraft, new T...
The draft regulations are not 'a strategic blunder', they are essential to ensure that high-carbon projects cannot receive public funding, write GH2's...