Three reasons why road transport in the ETS is a bad idea
The EU is currently discussing its climate and energy policy for 2030. As part of these discussions German carmakers have been advocating the inclusion of road transport emissions in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). Some countries like Denmark also support the idea, although for different reasons. This briefing explains why transport’s inclusion in the ETS would delay emissions reductions in transport, undermine more effective climate policies for transport, and weaken the ETS and increase costs.
While this paper argues against including road transport in the cross-sector ETS, it does not argue against much more transport-specific forms of credit trading. Europe can draw lessons from Californian policies that allow trading of low-carbon vehicle and fuel credits between vehicle and energy suppliers respectively that truly encourage low-carbon investment and innovation in transport.
Related Articles
View All
Joint letter on low-carbon steel credits in the review of EU CO₂ emission standards for cars
Creating predictable demand for genuinely low-carbon steel is urgent. If properly designed, low-carbon steel credits can create a lead market for gree...
Drive forward or turn back? Four reasons to vote for a strong automotive package
The coming weeks will be crucial for the future of the EU's car and van CO₂ standards and Clean Corporate Vehicles Regulation — a choice that will sha...
The zombie engine: How Brussels bureaucrats are breathing false life into combustion
If you poured rapeseed oil into a combustion engine and declared it a "zero-emission vehicle," you would be laughed at. But in the EU Parliament, this...