T&E’s position on a Multilateral Investment Court
The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS. This briefing outlines T&E's position on MIC.
Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-statedispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS.
Related Articles
View All
Europe’s sovereignty budget
Imagine if Europe chose to spend a half a trillion a year on a dependency that benefits regimes which wish it harm. We don’t have to imagine it. We ar...
Draft Guidelines on State Aid to the air transport sector - T&E consultation response
Making the European Competitiveness Fund the backbone of a green industrial strategy
A new briefing explains why the forthcoming 'ECF' should focus on strategic cleantech with the highest decarbonisation and scale-up potential.