Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
The result of the vote was tied, with 29 MEPs supporting the more environmentally effective ‘airspace’ proposal against 29 MEPs voting for the weaker deal. This means the weaker trilogue deal is rejected. Peter Liese, the leading MEP on the subject, must now take the original committee position in favour of the airspace decision to plenary on 3 April.
Aoife O’Leary, policy officer for aviation at Transport & Environment, said: “The aviation ETS is the only international climate measure in place today that tackles aviation’s soaring emissions. The trilogue compromise, which would effectively have dismantled the ETS, was a bad deal and rightly rejected by the Parliament. This decision sends the clear signal to political leaders in member states, to industry and to foreign countries that the EU’s sovereignty is not subject to external bullying.”
The rejected deal was agreed earlier this month in trilogue by Liese, under heavy political pressure from the UK, France, Germany and Airbus as well as external politicking from Russia, China and the US.
“The Parliament has clearly said that Europe will not dismantle the ETS at the will of Airbus or foreign states and should stand firm as an environmental leader once again. An environmentally effective deal that covers emissions from all aircraft operating in Europe must be found in the upcoming negotiations,” O’Leary concluded.
Aviation is the most carbon-intensive transport mode, responsible for about 5% of man-made climate change. If aviation were a country it would be ranked 7th in the world for CO2 emissions – between Germany and Korea. EU aviation emissions, a third of global totals, have doubled since 1990 and will triple by 2050 if unchecked.