Prof. James Corbett of University of Delaware, one of the leading authors of the study, said: “An IMO policy implemented on time in 2020 could reduce the health burden on coastal communities, particularly in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The inverse is also true. A delay would ensure that health impacts from sulphur emissions will persist in coastal communities that are exposed, where shipping lanes are most intense and communities most densely populated.”
Ship heavy fuel oil is the most harmful transport fuel in use today. Having sulphur content up to 3,500 times higher than the latest European diesel standards for vehicles. The shipping industry is by far the world’s biggest emitter of sulphur, For this reason, the IMO unanimously adopted in 2008 a global sulphur cap requiring all ships to use fuels with a maximum 0. 5%sulphur content as from 1st January 2020.
The 2020 implementation date was, however, made dependent on the results of a study to determine whether sufficient low sulphur fuel would be available then. That study, commissioned by the IMO and published last August shows that under all scenarios and sensitivity options considered, there will be sufficient clean fuel available in 2020.
John Maggs, senior policy advisor at Seas At Risk said: “The world has waited far too long for ships to ditch dirty fuels. With hundreds of thousands of additional premature deaths predicted and the toll falling heaviest on the developing world, the human health implications of ship’s continuing to burn dirty fuels beyond 2020 are clear and utterly unacceptable. With cleaner fuels available in 2020 there is no excuse for further delay.”
Bill Hemmings, shipping director at Transport & Environment, said: “Both the health study and clean fuel study make it clear that the 2020 data must be respected. The shipping and refinery industries have already had eight years to prepare and there are still three more years before final implementation in 2020. There are no more excuses for deadly inaction.”