Report

Cost-effective renewables: How do other options compare to bioenergy?

March 30, 2017

Transport and Environment, Birdlife Europe and the European Environmental Bureau requested CE Delft to determine the most cost-effective optimal renewable energy mix for the 28 EU member states and, specifically, for Germany, France, Sweden, Spain, Poland and the UK, taking into account social discount rates and the most recent cost developments.

This briefing summarises the study’s findings:

  • In the EU reference scenario 2013 over 90% of realisable bioenergy potentials are exploited and only 35% of other renewables;
  • The most cost-effective renewable energy mix in 2030 has a significantly lower share of bioenergy than the EU reference scenario 2013 and the GHG 40 and GHG40EE scenarios in the IA 2030;
  • Governmental interventions are required to meet the most cost optimal mix;
  • In most of the six selected member states trends are similar, although there are location and country-specific features.

Related Articles

View All
Opinion

Shipping is flying the flag for multilateral climate action: why aren’t we celebrating yet?

T&E’s William Todts looks at whether a climate deal that potentially doubles the global biofuels market can be considered a good deal?

Press Release

EU rules out production aid in blow to battery and cleantech industry

The European Commission missed a big opportunity to create a cleantech bazooka.

Aircraft on a runway
Press Release

Weak aircraft innovation undercutting aviation’s green transition

As the aviation industry continue to gather at the Paris Air Show, where manufacturers are showcasing their latest fossil-fuel-powered aircraft, new T...