The best available scientific evidence shows that the carbon costs of many bioenergy options are high.
Two principle gaps exist in the current accounting scheme for GHG emissions from bioenergy and biofuels, one temporal and one spatial in nature:
While both studies presented in this briefing concentrate on carbon, it must be noted that other environmental impacts, such as loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, are also significant and must be considered in policy decisions on bioenergy and biofuels.
T&E’s William Todts looks at whether a climate deal that potentially doubles the global biofuels market can be considered a good deal?
The European Commission missed a big opportunity to create a cleantech bazooka.
As the aviation industry continue to gather at the Paris Air Show, where manufacturers are showcasing their latest fossil-fuel-powered aircraft, new T...