Three reasons why road transport in the ETS is a bad idea
The EU is currently discussing its climate and energy policy for 2030. As part of these discussions German carmakers have been advocating the inclusion of road transport emissions in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). Some countries like Denmark also support the idea, although for different reasons. This briefing explains why transport’s inclusion in the ETS would delay emissions reductions in transport, undermine more effective climate policies for transport, and weaken the ETS and increase costs.
While this paper argues against including road transport in the cross-sector ETS, it does not argue against much more transport-specific forms of credit trading. Europe can draw lessons from Californian policies that allow trading of low-carbon vehicle and fuel credits between vehicle and energy suppliers respectively that truly encourage low-carbon investment and innovation in transport.
Related Articles
View All
Charging infrastructure has far outpaced EV sales in all but one EU country – analysis
Only Malta falls short on the EU’s fleet-based target for public charging.
EU backs electrification to make Europe more secure
EU Commission identifies grids as a bottleneck for electrification, promising to standardise vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology
Are the EV tariffs working? Western carmakers shifted production to EU, but Chinese brands continue to grow – analysis
Imports of Chinese batteries, which face virtually no tariffs, increased seven fold