Three reasons why road transport in the ETS is a bad idea
The EU is currently discussing its climate and energy policy for 2030. As part of these discussions German carmakers have been advocating the inclusion of road transport emissions in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). Some countries like Denmark also support the idea, although for different reasons. This briefing explains why transport’s inclusion in the ETS would delay emissions reductions in transport, undermine more effective climate policies for transport, and weaken the ETS and increase costs.
While this paper argues against including road transport in the cross-sector ETS, it does not argue against much more transport-specific forms of credit trading. Europe can draw lessons from Californian policies that allow trading of low-carbon vehicle and fuel credits between vehicle and energy suppliers respectively that truly encourage low-carbon investment and innovation in transport.
Related Articles
View All
The EU Clean Corporate Vehicles Regulation: the industrial and economic benefits of “Made-in-EU” electric company cars
New independent modelling by Fraunhofer ISI shows that implementation of the Clean Corporate Vehicles Regulation could deliver up to €48bn in value cr...
Rapid transition to electric company cars could generate 344,000 EU jobs by 2030 - study
Setting targets on companies to go electric and limiting financial support only for company cars that are electric and Made-in-EU would see economic g...
Franco-German car deal a ‘historic mistake’ that weakens climate ambition and Europe’s car industry
Deal to loosen the EU’s car CO₂ standards and IAA requirements a ‘historic mistake’ that puts Europe’s position in the global EV and battery race in j...