On June 9, the Commission published the draft delegated act containing the proposal for adoption of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
The ESRS, which are mandated by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), are a central piece of the European Green Deal and the European ambition to move to a carbon neutral economy by 2050. They will allow companies to better communicate to their stakeholders on the environmental and social risks and impacts they face. The European standards are a groundbreaking initiative from the Union, as they are more ambitious in scope and depth compared to similar international standards currently under development.
However, the proposal on the table jeopardises the European ambition and risks undermining the implementation of the entire disclosure framework and the overall transparency objective at the heart of the CSRD.
T&E carefully analysed the content changes introduced by the Commission in comparison with the proposal published by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) in November 2022. As an environmental organisation actively involved in the technical work of EFRAG, we are deeply concerned about several aspects of the Commission’s proposal.
Therefore, we urge the Commission to address the key concerns and recommendations highlighted below:
1.Materiality assessment and mandatory metrics
We oppose the proposal by the European Commission of making all topical disclosures subject to materiality assessment by the undertaking. We find this change particularly problematic for several reasons:
2.Phase-in
We disagree with the additional phase-ins proposed by the Commission as they would not provide any tangible benefits. In fact, they would only add additional complexity to the application of the Directive and allow the possibility to omit very relevant information on the first years of reporting, for which a large number of companies already received exemption.
In addition, companies under the scope of the Directive and with less than 750 employees must already collect and possess basic information such as data on their own workforce. Therefore it is reasonable, and in line with the spirit of the CSRD, for them to make it transparent and publicly available.
3.Voluntary indicators
We are concerned about the Commission’s proposal to make some disclosure requirements voluntary. This concerns in particular the cross-cutting standard ESRS 2 and the topical standards on biodiversity (ESRS E4) and own workforce (ESRS S1).
In fact, introducing the “voluntary” status to critical disclosure requirements under a legally binding framework just allows companies to be relieved of all responsibilities towards their reporting. Thus meaning, for example, that if companies deliberately omit pieces of information material to their businesses, in particular having significant risks, they cannot, by any means, be held accountable. On the contrary, they could evade any legal repercussions.
We therefore call on the Commission to reconsider these changes and adopt a proposal that fosters true sustainability transparency for companies and puts Europe at the forefront in corporate reporting.
Last year, President Von der Leyen announced her commitment to slash reporting requirements for companies by 25%. The objective was to boost the EU's ...
Europe needs fresh investment to support its green industry in the face of global competition. Unspent covid recovery funds and ETS revenues provide j...
Study from Voxeurop and European Investigative Collaborations shows that companies engaged in oil extraction, car manufacturing and fashion are some o...