Publications

T&E’s position on a Multilateral Investment Court

April 25, 2018

The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS. This briefing outlines T&E's position on MIC.

The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-statedispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS.

Related Articles

View All
Sustainable Finance

Sustainability reporting is much more than bureaucratic red tape

Last year, President Von der Leyen announced her commitment to slash reporting requirements for companies by 25%. The objective was to boost the EU's ...

Sustainable Finance

The hidden EU cash that no one’s talking about

Europe needs fresh investment to support its green industry in the face of global competition. Unspent covid recovery funds and ETS revenues provide j...

Cars, Sustainable Finance

Polluting carmakers in the top 10 recipients of green funds

Study from Voxeurop and European Investigative Collaborations shows that companies engaged in oil extraction, car manufacturing and fashion are some o...