The proposed Flight Emissions label is a missed opportunity to allow consumers to make truly informed choices.
While Transport & Environment welcomes the Label as an opportunity to provide greater transparency in aviation emissions, the proposed Implementing Act has several issues:
The non-CO2 effects of aviation are yet again hidden from passengers.
The proposed method to apportion emissions to belly cargo would hide an additional 4 Mt of CO2 from European consumers, equal to 4% of all passenger emissions.
CO2 efficiency per kilometre is not a relevant indicator to assess the environmental impact of a flight.
Comparing the emissions of a given flight only to emissions of other flights on the same route is misleading whenever a train alternative is available.
Passengers should be given more information about SAF than its life cycle emissions.
A new analysis by T&E shows that 25% of European aviation’s contrail-related global warming comes from night flights in autumn and winter, which make ...
Opportunities for scaling up contrail avoidance in harmony with air traffic management
There are welcome signs that the European Investment Bank intends to tackle transport poverty via the ETS2. The institution should also ramp up suppor...