This briefing explores the aviation sector's status as one of the most undertaxed in Europe and examines the supposed legal obstacles to ending this anomaly.
Taxing transport fuels is almost universal these days in road transport as a means to raise government revenues, pay for road infrastructure, discourage excess driving and more recently to limit climate impacts. Fuel (kerosene) used for international aviation (flights between separate countries) is, on the other hand, universally untaxed as a result of a myriad of intergovernmental air services agreements (ASAs) concluded over the past 50 years or so. These agreements were motivated originally by the view that aviation could help bring the world together after WWII and later promoted by industry association IATA and the UN aviation agency ICAO. Many countries nevertheless tax fuel uplifted for their domestic flights – the US, Australia, Brazil, Japan, India, Saudi Arabia and several countries in South East Asia.
Taxing aviation fuels in Europe was not permitted until the 2003 revision to the Energy Tax Directive enabled domestic aviation fuel to be taxed. Fuel uplifted for all other flights remained exempt but this provision could be waived for flights between two EU states subject to bilateral agreement.
Our briefing outlines a number of recommendations for EU governments and the EU to remedy this situation.
T&E, EDL, Norsk e-fuel, Arcadia e-fuels, Caphenia, Nordic Electrofuel and spark e-fuels are calling upon the German government to maintain national ta...
The Hungarian presidency is proposing to exempt aviation and shipping from fuel tax for the next 20 years. The text recommends that the EU, after 15 y...
EU walks back on aviation climate law on non-CO2
The EU Commission bows to pressure from legacy airlines to exclude long-haul flights from the scope of an aviation emissions monitoring scheme, which ...