Michael O’Leary’s recent plea in the Telegraph calling for an end to market distortion in aviation is a request which is echoed by the ‘tiny number of Nimbys and environmentalists’, to which category my organization presumably falls into.
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
If the state should no longer be responsible for determining where new airports and runways are built, then surely Mr O’Leary would agree that the state should no longer be responsible for the hundreds of millions of pounds of state aid and subsidies which are given to European airlines every year. As for the fate of British tourism, Mr O’Leary will be well aware that, partly as a result of his highly successful, but highly uncomfortable airline, Brits spend more money abroad than tourists bring into the country, resulting in a net loss for the UK economy. Similarly, his claim that British businesses urgently need new runways doesn’t add up – business travel by air has fallen 23% since 2000. All in all, it sounds as if Mr O’Leary would rather just like it if there were more runways for his low-cost planes, at someone else’s expense. Sounds a little bit like market distortion, Michael.
Europe needs a cleantech State Aid overhaul
The EU wants to lead the cleantech transition - for that it needs to replace its traditional project-by-project State Aid system with automatic, banka...
The EU's funding instrument to support the rollout of public charging lacks €1.25 billion at a critical moment. An initiative to fill this gap should ...
National schemes could be financed by the revenues generated by the EU’s carbon market and Social Climate Fund, analysis finds. It would enable many l...