For member states, Dieselgate never happened
It has been more than a year since the European Commission presented its type approval proposals (or TAFR) to reform the current system of vehicles testing following the Dieselgate scandal. Following extensive consideration by the European Parliament and Council of Ministers, the final negotiations to agree the changes are imminent. The Parliament voted its position on 4 April; the Council is expected to agree most technical details at a working group meeting on the 26 and 27 April and reach a final agreement at the Competitiveness Council on 29 May.
Interested in this kind of news?
Receive them directly in your inbox. Delivered once a week.
But as member states also hammer out their final position, clear battle lines are being drawn between those seeking to reform the discredited system of car approval and those seeking to retain the status quo. This briefing (which can be downloaded below) and infographic summarise the key position differences between the Parliament and national governments.
Related Articles
View All
Drive forward or turn back? Four reasons to vote for a strong automotive package
The coming weeks will be crucial for the future of the EU's car and van CO₂ standards and Clean Corporate Vehicles Regulation — a choice that will sha...
The zombie engine: How Brussels bureaucrats are breathing false life into combustion
If you poured rapeseed oil into a combustion engine and declared it a "zero-emission vehicle," you would be laughed at. But in the EU Parliament, this...
What Europe can learn from China if it wants to save its industry
Something I learned from my trip to China: you can be fast followers if you're willing to learn from the best.