Including biofuels and e-fuels in road transport would reduce available volumes for hard-to-decarbonise sectors.
The EU climate targets will slash demand for oil and gas. As a result, fuel suppliers are investing in e-fuels and biofuels to replace them. It is in their interest to maximise the number of sales markets for those fuels, despite hard-to-abate sectors such as aviation and shipping needing to prioritise fuels based on green hydrogen (and advanced biofuels in the case of aviation) for their own use.
However, as part of its market maximisation strategy, the fuels industry tries to convince aviation and shipping actors that they would benefit if road transport also used biofuels and e-fuels. They claim that “using e-fuels in trucks and buses will help scale up production, reduce their costs, and make them more available for planes and ships”. They also claim that “Road hauliers will bear most of the high cost, making e-kerosene almost free for airlines.” This is incorrect, as this simple explainer will make clear.
To find out more, download the briefing.
T&E, EDL, Norsk e-fuel, Arcadia e-fuels, Caphenia, Nordic Electrofuel and spark e-fuels are calling upon the German government to maintain national ta...
The Hungarian presidency is proposing to exempt aviation and shipping from fuel tax for the next 20 years. The text recommends that the EU, after 15 y...
EU walks back on aviation climate law on non-CO2
The EU Commission bows to pressure from legacy airlines to exclude long-haul flights from the scope of an aviation emissions monitoring scheme, which ...