The best available scientific evidence shows that the carbon costs of many bioenergy options are high.
Two principle gaps exist in the current accounting scheme for GHG emissions from bioenergy and biofuels, one temporal and one spatial in nature:
While both studies presented in this briefing concentrate on carbon, it must be noted that other environmental impacts, such as loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, are also significant and must be considered in policy decisions on bioenergy and biofuels.
RED III implementation for Europe's member states
EU to impose tariffs on Chinese biodiesel, but this will not stop palm oil fraud, warns T&E
Advanced and waste biofuels are increasingly promoted as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels and damaging crop-based biofuels, so-called “advance...