Browse by topic: Climate Change and Energy, Environmental policy, Fuels, Transport policy


Open letter to decision makers calling for the EU biofuels policy to be fixed

Sketch of a book (default image for publications

T&E, as well over 100 other organisations signed up to an open letter to EU decision makers on EU biofuels policy. Urgent action is needed to halt the expansion of land-based biofuels (i.e. biofuels, or agrofuels, made from food crops or dedicated energy crops) which bring few or no climate benefits while putting extra pressure on scarce land resources, especially for food and feed.

How to fix a biofuels policy: a guide for the European Parliament

This week six committees in the European Parliament will vote on the Commission’s proposal to address indirect land-use change (ILUC) emissions related to the EU’s biofuels policy. This is all in the run up to the vote in the leading committee - Environment, Public Health and Food Safety on 10 July and the plenary vote in September. It is unusual that so many committees are deciding on such a technical file at this stage in the process. So, this blog is a little guide for busy Members of the European Parliament on what is really important to keep in mind when thinking about the environmental, social and economic implications of the EU’s biofuels policy.

Commission misses opportunity to get biofuel policy right

With today’s biofuel proposal [1], the European Commission has acknowledged the climate impact of biofuel emissions from indirect land-use change (ILUC) [2] but does not tackle it. The proposed obligation to monitor ILUC emissions from biofuels will not solve the key environmental issue of halting production of unsustainable biofuels that are, in some cases, more harmful to the climate than fossil fuels, Transport & Environment says.

Opposition that risks having no clean future for liquid transport fuels

Jos Dings, Director T&E

Opinion by Jos Dings - T&E director
People who follow our work – and Europe’s environmental policy – a little bit will have noticed that two fuels-related draft laws keep dragging on without any apparent progress. The first one is what to do about indirect land use change effects of biofuels (key words: Iluc, biodiesel). The second is whether or not to give petrol and diesel from unconventional fossil sources a higher lifecycle greenhouse gas default value (key words: fuel quality directive, tar sands).